The Skin

Last updated (19 November 2003)

Scaly Click on the image to download a larger version
The patient is undergoing exicision of the lesion in theatre
How should the defect be reconstructed?
Permit to heal by secondary intention
Cover with a split skin graft
Closer with a Wolff full thicknewss graft
Rotation of a TRAM flap
Microvascular transfer of a Radial forearm flap

The answer

The defect is best closed with a split skin graft.

The student may say

I would ask the opinion of a plastic surgeon. As far as I know the most simple method would be to apply a split skin graft. A superior cosmetic result may be obtained with more elaborate reconstructions, however with increasing complexity comes increasing risk. The main concern in this gentleman would be to remove the lesion and secure rapid healing with a good oncologic result and minimal risk.

Small Print

Healing by secondary intention would occur but take a long time and cause the patient ongoing discomfort and inconvenience. Even though purulant material was coming from the lesion, there was no surrounding cellulitis so reconstruction at the time of the excision is reasonable.

A full thickness or Wolff graft is useful in this location and gives a superior cosmetic result to split skin, however the defect in this case is too large for a full thickness graft and the chances of it taking would be low. In addition, taking a large enough full thickness graft would leave another defect that would require reconstruction.

A transverse rectus abdominus (TRAM) flap is a large flap that takes a skin ellipse with underlying rectus sheath with the rectus abdominus muscle which is divided low down to preserve the superior epigastric artery and vein which supplies circulation to the flap. This flap is then rotated to fill another defect most commonly to reconstruct the breast following mastectomy. It would not reach the head and would be too bulky if it did.

A free flap could be taken from somewhere and the blood vessels anastamosed to those in the defect in the temple, but this is too elaborate and risky an operation in this elderly gentleman in whom a split skin graft would work well with low risk.


Adrian P. Ireland